The sixth novel by Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky “Demons” also called “The Possessed” was written in 1872. This is one of the most politicized works of the writer, which he wrote under the impression of the activities of the emerging terrorist and revolutionary movements in Russia. The novel became a kind of warning about a social catastrophe, which will lead to cruel methods of achieving the idea of universal happiness and the principle “the end justifies the means.”
Dostoevsky did not plan a grandiose thing: he wanted to express himself on the topic of the emerging “Nechaevism” and similar political phenomena on several pages. The work was not even conceived in an artistic style, but as a result, a prediction novel came out from under his pen, which has not lost its relevance so far.
Russian society rather coolly accepted the new novel, and some critics even declared the work “slander” and “nonsense”. Over time, the situation has changed little. Most supporters of the Russian revolutionary movement perceived “Demons” as a vicious caricature of their ideas. Such a reputation prevented the wide popularity of the work.
Unlike Russia, Western culture has appreciated the socio-moral depth of the novel. “Demons” by Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky had a huge influence on the philosophical literature of the turn of the 19th-20th centuries, of which Nietzsche and Camus were famous representatives .
The attitude towards “Demons” in the post-Soviet space has changed quite recently. Contemporaries understood the prophecy of Dostoevsky’s ideas, his desire to show the world the danger of radical revolutionary and atheistic ideas. The writer expressed the depth of alienation towards his characters in the title and epigraph, taken from Pushkin ‘s poem of the same name . Who is the main “demon” in the work?
Initially, “Demons” was supposed to become part of a single epic novel, but due to financial problems, the author could not realize his plan and his publisher Katkov set strict conditions for the work of the writer. So instead of a big novel, the author released five books: “Teenager”, “Crime and Punishment”, “Demons”, “The Brothers Karamazov”, “Idiot”.
Also, in the novel, you can find references to real people. as example, Dostoevsky ridiculed I.S. Turgenev with whom he didn’t agree on the liberal-Western ideology , using the image of Karamzinov. The prototype of Stavrogin is the head of the Petrashevsky circle, for participation in which the young Dostoevsky was almost executed. One more thing is the removal of the chapters (“At Tikhon’s”), where Stavrogin tells the elder about the molestation of the girl. It was banned in Russia and removed from the novel by the publisher himself. However, it is there that Stavrogin’s worldview clashes with Tikhon’s Christian morality, and the reader sees the defeat of the “demonic personality.”
You can read it on our site in French, English , or Russian as well as in our bilingual section (Russian/English)
Extract of the book:
Chapter 1
IN UNDERTAKING to describe the recent and strange incidents in our town, till lately wrapped in uneventful obscurity, I find myself forced in absence of literary skill to begin my story rather far back, that is to say, with certain biographical details concerning that talented and highly-esteemed gentleman, Stepan Trofimovitch Verhovensky. I trust that these details may at least serve as an introduction, while my projected story itself will come later.
I will say at once that Stepan Trofimovitch had always filled a particular rôle among us, that of the progressive patriot, so to say, and he was passionately fond of playing the part—so much so that I really believe he could not have existed without it. Not that I would put him on a level with an actor at a theatre, God forbid, for I really have a respect for him. This may all have been the effect of habit, or rather, more exactly of a generous propensity he had from his earliest years for indulging in an agreeable day-dream in which he figured as a picturesque public character. He fondly loved, for instance, his position as a “persecuted” man and, so to speak, an “exile.” There is a sort of traditional glamour about those two little words that fascinated him once for all and, exalting him gradually in his own opinion, raised him in the course of years to a lofty pedestal very gratifying to vanity. In an English satire of the last century, Gulliver, returning from the land of the Lilliputians where the people were only three or four inches high, had grown so accustomed to consider himself a giant among them, that as he walked along the streets of London he could not help crying out to carriages and passers-by to be careful and get out of his way for fear he should crush them, imagining that they were little and he was still a giant. He was laughed at and abused for it, and rough coachmen even lashed at the giant with their whips. But was that just? What may not be done by habit? Habit had brought Stepan Trofimovitch almost to the same position, but in a more innocent and inoffensive form, if one may use such expressions, for he was a most excellent man.
I am even inclined to suppose that towards the end he had been entirely forgotten everywhere; but still it cannot be said that his name had never been known. It is beyond question that he had at one time belonged to a certain distinguished constellation of celebrated leaders of the last generation, and at one time—though only for the briefest moment—his name was pronounced by many hasty persons of that day almost as though it were on a level with the names of Tchaadaev, of Byelinsky, of Granovsky, and of Herzen, who had only just begun to write abroad. But Stepan Trofimovitch’s activity ceased almost at the moment it began, owing, so to say, to a “vortex of combined circumstances.” And would you believe it? It turned out afterwards that there had been no “vortex” and even no “circumstances,” at least in that connection. I only learned the other day to my intense amazement, though on the most unimpeachable authority, that Stepan Trofimovitch had lived among us in our province not as an “exile” as we were accustomed to believe, and had never even been under police supervision at all. Such is the force of imagination! All his life he sincerely believed that in certain spheres he was a constant cause of apprehension, that every step he took was watched and noted, and that each one of the three governors who succeeded one another during twenty years in our province came with special and uneasy ideas concerning him, which had, by higher powers, been impressed upon each before everything else, on receiving the appointment. Had anyone assured the honest man on the most irrefutable grounds that he had nothing to be afraid of, he would certainly have been offended. Yet Stepan Trofimovitch was a most intelligent and gifted man, even, so to say, a man of science, though indeed, in science … well, in fact he had not done such great things in science. I believe indeed he had done nothing at all. But that’s very often the case, of course, with men of science among us in Russia.
Continue to read
I hope you’ll enjoy this book.
| Help the site stay free, buy us a cup of coffee |  | Aidez-nous à maintenir le site gratuit en nous offrant une tasse de café |
| If you liked this article, subscribe , put likes, write comments!. |
| Share on social networks |
| Check out Our Latest Posts |
AKirill, Learn, apprenez, translation, traduction, livres bilingues, bilingual books 
2 thoughts on “What do you know about the novel “Demons” by Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky”